The United States unConstitution (Part 2): Mandatory Vaccines

     It seems as though it is nearly impossible to not even have simply heard of this newest flaw in the campaign of Presidential candidate Rick Perry. this flaw goes by the name of a controversial vaccine     known as the HPV vaccine. ('brand name' Gardasil and Cervarix)
     Rick Perry helped in an attempt to establish a law that would demand young girls in the state of Texas to get a vaccine to prevent against a STD called Cervical Cancer. doesnt something seem wrong here?

     Forcing people to get a vaccine already goes against the constitution, but forcing young girls to do something by law already feels wrong, and not only that, but this also is assuming that girls barely a decade old are going to be promiscuous in their interactions with others!
     But delving into that would bring me off topic, so we'll set that aside.

     Lets take a step into the past, shall we? a few years back, an alleged pandemic reared its head. The Swine Flu. (cue the dramatic music) There was talk throughout the Government and CDC of making the H1N1 vaccine mandatory by law, but came head to head with opposition, and as should be obvious to you, the reader, is that the opposition won. good thing, too...not only was it not truly a pandemic, and still has not reached such levels, but also the vaccine itself was dangerous.
     Infact, its that way with some other if not most of the mandatory vaccines that are unconstitutionally so. most if not all vaccines contain Mercury, called thimerosal. And the H1N1 had side effects that in itself equated the effects of the flu itself. the DTaP that is mandatory in some states contains formaldehyde, which is an enbalming fluid( something like this is dangrous to anyone at anylevel. and the HPV vaccine can cause anything from a allergic reaction to Guillain-Barre Syndrome

And the Government is forcing the citizens of America to get these vaccines?

above links didnt work? copy and paste into your search bar here!
http://www.gardasil.com/
http://www.cervarix.com
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/perry-mandatory-hpv-vaccination-of-girls-was-wrong/2011/03/29/gIQAnjY5SK_blog.html
http://www.blissplan.com/wellness/vaccination-risks/
http://www.cdc.gov/
http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/gbs/gbs.htm

The United States unConstitution (Part 1): Martial Law

August 2009, a city in New Jersey a law was proposed to implement Martial Law by placing a curfew—for adults! This would make it illegal for someone to be outside their home from 12AM midnight to 7AM, if you’re caught outside your home? And simply agree to the charges, going willingly with the officers? $2,000 and 90 days in jail. And that’s not including possible charges of resisting arrest or something like that; and don’t forget the occasional officer who feels threatened by the ‘outlaw’, allowing them certain ‘defensive maneuvers’. And all this in an attempt to lower an already lowered and decreasing crime rate.

 So now this begs the question, is all this right? Is Martial law unconstitutional? Lets start by defining Martial Law. Martial law is “The suspension of regular government and habeas corpus or the reliance of military law enforcement.”, and Google defines it as “Military government involving the suspension of ordinary law.” Suspension of government and law? Habeas Corpus being denied? Being run—or controlled—by the military? It sure does sound like something isn’t right. If you search ‘military ruling’, you will come across a term called ‘military dictatorship’.

            A dictatorship? Isn’t that something the constitution supposed to be protecting us from? Maybe we’re simply missing something…lets look at what Martial Law entails, shall we? In this, the government will seize and control all resources, place a curfew, can search you and your property without probable cause or a warrant. This already goes against the constitution, so then why is this even being considered an option in the United States?

Lybia's Rebellion and reform

t seems as though there is a trend among countries now trying to reform their government. This trend of rebellions goes by the name of Arab Spring. the most talkd about of these in the news at the moment seems to be Lybia.
Before the beginning of the rebellion, Lybia was a mix of Socialism and Islamic governments under Ghadaffi, a man who declared himself dictator 42 years ago, with a government based off of his 'Green Book'. and now, after the rebellions, they finally have what they have dubbed National Transitional Council, or the NTC. the NTC is a political, anti-Ghadaffi governmental body that seeks to represent the Lybian People as an interim government. this new government is still in its infancy in power as it was only established on February 27th, and only now are the rebellions to set thin new government in place cooling down allowing the NTC to come to fruition.
Now, all we can do as an observing country can o is watch and hope that their new form of government doesnt 'go south' as is ver possible with all political reform; and instead, turns out to be a benefit, not only to Lybia, but also to the rest of the world possibly offering help when needed.